it has come to my attention that there is a post going around
if you don’t know what i’m talking about then just move along, probably
“Gaslighting or gas-lighting is a form of mental abuse in which false information is presented with the intent of…
YES. YES. YES.
I had actually spent like 3 hours last night writing a reply post to the short version to show people who were re blogging it that much of the information was forged, madeup, edited or just sounded downright untrue in the long version. But I went back on the wepage and lost it all, so I gave up.
But to sum up what I was going to post;
1. The guy who wrote it at least (but not limited to) 20 times stated that he was “Sorry for doing things but then insisted PK was the abusive one in that situation for being upset.
This lines up with what PK was saying when PK said he was remembering things wrong and getting upset about it. Which was incredibly clear when he showed he was passionate about the issue of the buttons placement enough to draw out three panels describing why PK was ‘being unreasonable’ for being upset about it.
But this actually proved PK’s statements correct by showing us in his own comments that he had definitely remembered being there and even apologized for those things but refused to acknowledge his own behavior and the way he acted was an offense.
Like lets be real for a second.
If you were a professional artist, wouldn’t you be upset if you had prepared months in advance for a convention, and justly under a lot of stress- when suddenly someone you invited tries to make you print out all of another artists work and then tries to take control of your stand and your own merchandise and attempts numerous times to force you to change your prices or to move your stuff the way they wanted it when you said *No* clearly several times?
You’d be ticked. And Pk was ticked.
2. This guy stated at least 15 times that the evidence to back up his statements “cannot be found”, “I deleted it” or “I can’t recover it”. Which is almost every. single instance. That he was required to give crucial proof to back any of this up. Yet he is able to retrieve other “skype logs” and tumblr asks from over a year ago.
Including one tumblr ask in particular that he stated was his friends ask, but was clearly sent to his own inbox as you can see when you look at the words “answered you” which he didn’t blur out.
It’s also notable to mention that he directly wrote things in-between certain ’skype logs’ which proves he could have easily edited any of these at any time and why a bunch of them look extremely fake.
See the Green? He manually wrote that in.
3.He put about 30 wikipedia terms for Abuse, mental disorders and phobia’s over almost every single paragraph. He literally diagnosed himself with 20 cases of traumatic phobia’s and mental disorders????
You can’t diagnose yourself with all of that. If you really had all of that you could never go outside.
And I’m pretty sure an honest victim of abuse wouldn’t have gone to all the trouble to do this. It’s so fishy it practically reeks.
4. He clearly stated he was upset PK cut ties with him and once in one of the chat logs and somewhere in the long post he stated that he didn’t actually think PK was abusive until he read that vent post PK wrote about his actions at the convention and after they broke up.
Meaning, Pk’s actions did not come across to him as abusive at all until he had read PK’s vent post on how PK felt about his behavior AFTER THIS HAD ALL HAPPENED.
5. HIS FINAL APOLOGY EVEN DIRECTLY STATES THAT HE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE -DID- IN FACT, GRAVELY UPSET PK AT THE CONVENTION AND HE KNEW AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE REASONS WHY.
THIS PLACES HIM AT THE SCENE. THAT HE REALLY DID DO EVERYTHING PK SAID HE DID.
YET HE FEIGNS INNOCENCE AND STATES THAT PK WAS IN THE WRONG FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE LONG POST, WHICH CONTRADICTS EVERY SINGLE APOLOGY AND EVERY STATEMENT HE MADE THROUGHOUT.
The entire way the post is written and it’s length is clearly aimed for revenge and to make social justice warriors upset. Not as an honest account of victim abuse- and shouldn’t be taken seriously.